![]() ![]() Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 in that the characterising portion reads as follows (amendments indicated by the board): "characterized in that the NCC server (21) hosts a gateway LN instance (23) corresponding to the substation LN instance (13) and having an NCC related name (AA1E1Q3/QA1CSWI1) based on a functional name that is automatically translatable into the substation IED related name in case of changing SA communication and substation IED architecture, wherein the NCC related name has no substation IED specific name parts." Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that the characterising portion reads as follows (the added wording has been underlined by the board): Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3a differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 in that the word "generic" has been deleted in the characterising portion. "characterized in that the NCC server (21) hosts a gateway LN instance (23) corresponding to the substation LN instance (13) and having an NCC related name (AA1E1Q3/QA1CSWI1) based on a functional name that is devoid of any reference to the substation IED related name, with exception of a generic LN class, but automatically translatable into the substation IED related name in case of changing SA communication and substation IED architecture." Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 in that the characterising portion reads as follows (the added wording has been underlined by the board): "characterized in that the NCC server (21) hosts a gateway LN instance (23) corresponding to the substation LN instance (13) and having an NCC related name (AA1E1Q3/QA1CSWI1) based on a functional name that is devoid of any reference to the substation IED related name but automatically translatable into the substation IED related name in case of changing SA communication and substation IED architecture." ![]() Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that the characterising portion reads as follows (the added wording has been underlined by the board): "characterized in that the NCC server (21) hosts a gateway LN instance (23) corresponding to the substation LN instance (13) and having an NCC related name (AA1E1Q3/QA1CSWI1) based on a functional name that is automatically translatable into the substation IED related name in case of changing SA communication and substation IED architecture." Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the characterising portion reads as follows (the added wording has been underlined by the board): (g) automatically translatable into the substation IED related name." (f) having an NCC related name (AA1E1Q3/QA1CSWI1) based on a functional name that is (e) corresponding to the substation LN instance (13) and (d) characterized in that the NCC server (21) hosts a gateway LN instance (23) (c) via an NCC server (21) of the gateway IED (20), with a Network Control Centre NCC (30), (b) via a substation communication network (15), with a substation Intelligent Electronic Device IED (12) hosting a substation Logical Node LN instance (13) with a substation IED related name (Ctr19LD1/Q0CSWI2), and, (a) "A gateway IED (20) for a Substation Automation SA system automating an electric power substation, adapted to communicate according to IEC 61850, Claim 1 of the main request reads as follows (labelling by the board): The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed.Īt the end of the oral proceedings, the board's decision was announced. that the patent be maintained as granted (main request), or that the patent be maintained as amended on the basis of one of auxiliary requests 1 to 8 filed during the opposition proceedings or auxiliary requests 3a, 7a and 7b filed with the statement of grounds of appeal. ![]() The proprietor requested that the appealed decision be set aside and that the opposition be rejected, i.e. Oral proceedings were held before the board on 21 October 2021 by videoconference. The appeal by the patent proprietor lies from the interlocutory decision of the opposition division maintaining the present European patent in amended form on the basis of a ninth auxiliary request filed during the oral proceedings before the opposition division on 24 January 2017. Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)Īdded subject-matter - main request and auxiliary requests 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7a, 7b and 8 (yes): unallowable intermediate generalisationĪdmittance of late-filed requests - auxiliary requests 3 and 3a (no): "fresh case" Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Registerīibliographic information is available in:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |